Ifema hospital model. Implementation and start-up of the Pharmacy Department.

On the 20th of March 2020, triggered by the public health emergency declared,  the Health Authorities in Madrid reported a legal instruction (Orden 371/2020)  indicating the organization of a provisional hospital to admit patients with  COVID-19 at the Trade Fair Institution (IFEMA). Several pharmacists working in  the Pharmacy and Medical Devices Department of the Madrid Regional Health  Service were called to manage the Pharmacy Department of the  abovementioned hospital. Required permissions to set up a PD were here  authorized urgently. Tackling human and material resources, and computer  systems for drug purchase and electronic prescription, were some of the initial  issues that hindered the pharmaceutical provision required for patients from the  very day one. Once the purchase was assured, mainly by direct purchase from suppliers, drug dispensing up to 1,250 hospitalized patients (25 nursing units) and 8 ICU patients was taken on. Dispensing was carried out  through either drug stocks in the nursing units or individual patient dispensing  for certain drugs. Moreover, safety issues related to prescription were  considered, and as the electronic prescription was implemented we attained  100% prescriptions review and validation. The constitution of a multidisciplinary  Pharmacy and Therapeutics Committee let agree to a pharmacotherapy guide,  pres cription protocols, therapeutic equivalences, interactions, and drug  dispensing circuits. The Pharmacy Department strategy was to ensure a very  quick response to basic tasks keeping the aim to offer a pharmaceutical care of  the highest quality whenever possible. Working under a health emergency  situation, with many uncertainties and continuous pressure was a plight.  However, the spirit of collaboration in and out of the Pharmacy Department was  aligned with the whole hospital motivation to offer the highest quality of  healthcare. These were possibly the keys to allow caring for almost 4,000  patients during the 42 days that the hospital lasted.

El día 20 de marzo de 2020 la Consejería de Sanidad publicó una Orden  (371/2020) para la apertura de un centro hospitalario provisional para atender a  pacientes COVID-19 en la Institución Ferial de Madrid (IFEMA), por razón de  emergencia sanitaria. Se dispuso un equipo de farmacéuticos de la Subdirección  General de Farmacia y Productos Sanitarios para la apertura de un Servicio de  Farmacia, que obtuvo la autorización correspondiente por el órgano competente, con carácter de urgencia. La gestión de recursos humanos,  materiales y de herramientas informáticas para la adquisición y prescripción  electrónica fueron unas de las primeras dificultades que se solaparon con el  primer reto de garantizar la prestación farmacéutica a los pacientes que atendía  el hospital desde el mismo día uno. Asegurada la adquisición, fundamentalmente  mediante la compra directa a proveedores, se planteó la  dispensación para un máximo de 1.250 pacientes de hospitalización (25  controles de enfermería) y una Unidad de Cuidados Intensivos de 8 pacientes;  se establecieron botiquines en las unidades de enfermería y circuitos  individualizados de dispensación para determinados medicamentos. A su vez,  desde el primer momento se trabajó en la seguridad en la prescripción, llegando  a la revisión y validación del 100% de los tratamientos, una vez instaurada la  prescripción electrónica. La creación de una  Comisión de Farmacia y Terapéutica multidisciplinar permitió consensuar la guía farmacoterapéutica, protocolos de  prescripción, equivalencias terapéuticas, interacciones y circuitos de  dispensación de medicamentos. La estrategia del Servicio de Farmacia se basó  en asegurar una respuesta rápida en las funciones básicas, sin perder la visión  de incorporar una atención farmacéutica de la máxima calidad posible a medida  que iba siendo factible. A pesar de un escenario adverso, de incertidumbre y  presión continuas por la emergencia sanitaria, se ha mantenido un espíritu de  colaboración y contribución dentro y fuera del Servicio de Farmacia, alineado con un objetivo común de trabajo en equipo para brindar una atención sanitaria rápida y de la mayor calidad posible. Posiblemente éstas han sido las claves del  éxito que han permitido atender a casi 4.000 pacientes en los 42 días de vida  del hospital.

Medicare Program; Hospital Inpatient Prospective Payment Systems for Acute Care Hospitals and the Long-Term Care Hospital Prospective Payment System and Policy Changes and Fiscal Year 2017 Rates; Quality Reporting Requirements for Specific Providers; Graduate Medical Education; Hospital Notification Procedures Applicable to Beneficiaries Receiving Observation Services; Technical Changes Relating to Costs to Organizations and Medicare Cost Reports; Finalization of Interim Final Rules With Comment Period on LTCH PPS Payments for Severe Wounds, Modifications of Limitations on Redesignation by the Medicare Geographic Classification Review Board, and Extensions of Payments to MDHs and Low-Volume Hospitals. Final rule.

We are revising the Medicare hospital inpatient prospective payment systems (IPPS) for operating and capital-related costs of acute care hospitals to implement changes arising from our continuing experience with these systems for FY 2017. Some of these changes will implement certain statutory provisions contained in the Pathway for Sustainable Growth Reform Act of 2013, the Improving Medicare Post-Acute Care Transformation Act of 2014, the Notice of Observation Treatment and Implications for Care Eligibility Act of 2015, and other legislation. We also are providing the estimated market basket update to apply to the rate-of-increase limits for certain hospitals excluded from the IPPS that are paid on a reasonable cost basis subject to these limits for FY 2017. We are updating the payment policies and the annual payment rates for the Medicare prospective payment system (PPS) for inpatient hospital services provided by long-term care hospitals (LTCHs) for FY 2017. In addition, we are making changes relating to direct graduate medical education (GME) and indirect medical education payments; establishing new requirements or revising existing requirements for quality reporting by specific Medicare providers (acute care hospitals, PPS-exempt cancer hospitals, LTCHs, and inpatient psychiatric facilities), including related provisions for eligible hospitals and critical access hospitals (CAHs) participating in the Electronic Health Record Incentive Program; updating policies relating to the Hospital Value-Based Purchasing Program, the Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program, and the Hospital-Acquired Condition Reduction Program; implementing statutory provisions that require hospitals and CAHs to furnish notification to Medicare beneficiaries, including Medicare Advantage enrollees, when the beneficiaries receive outpatient observation services for more than 24 hours; announcing the implementation of the Frontier Community Health Integration Project Demonstration; and making technical corrections and changes to regulations relating to costs to related organizations and Medicare cost reports; we are providing notice of the closure of three teaching hospitals and the opportunity to apply for available GME resident slots under section 5506 of the Affordable Care Act. We are finalizing the provisions of interim final rules with comment period that relate to a temporary exception for certain wound care discharges from the application of the site neutral payment rate under the LTCH PPS for certain LTCHs; application of two judicial decisions relating to modifications of limitations on redesignation by the Medicare Geographic Classification Review Board; and legislative extensions of the Medicare-dependent, small rural hospital program and changes to the payment adjustment for low-volume hospitals.

Implementing hospital-based communication-and-resolution programs: lessons learned in New York City.

In 2010 five New York City hospitals implemented a communication-and-resolution program (CRP) in general surgery. The program's goals were to improve reporting of serious adverse events to risk management, support clinical staff in discussing these events with patients, rapidly investigate why injuries occurred, communicate to patients what was discovered, and offer apologies and compensation when the standard of care was not met. We report the hospitals' experiences with implementing the CRP over a twenty-two-month period. We found that all five hospitals improved disclosure and surveillance of adverse events but were not able to fully implement the program's compensation component. These experiences suggest that strong support from top leadership at the hospital and insurer levels, and adequate staff resources, are critical for the success of CRPs. Hospitals considering adopting a CRP should ensure that their organizations can tolerate risk, their leaders are willing to reinforce CRP implementation, and resources are in place to educate clinical staff about how the program can benefit them.

[Investigation of the air microbiota in the Saint Petersburg].

UNLABELLED: Microbiological tests of air in hospitals are the very important constituent element in prophylaxis of health care-associated infections. The aim of the study is to assess air in hospitals accordingly to the microbiological standards. The results were analyzed for 1993-2011. There were 0.2-4.2% of the samples that did not meet the standard. The maximum amount of microorganisms was found while SanPiN 2.1.3.1375-03 was effective within validity period SanPiN 2.1.3.2630-10 didn't normalize fungus, resulting in the minimal amount of mold. The frequency of sampling did not affect the result. DISCUSSION: Moulds are the causative agents of invasive fungal infections. Fungi can cause nosocomial infections. There is description of method to isolate fungi in the guidelines for control MUK 4.2.2942-11. CONCLUSION: It is necessary to use a new procedure when assessing the air in hospitals.

Providers' perceptions of the factors influencing the implementation of the New York State mandatory HIV testing law in two Urban academic emergency departments.

OBJECTIVES: Of the 1.1 million people in the United States infected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), more than 20% are unaware of their infection. To increase early diagnosis and treatment, New York State recently passed legislation mandating that HIV testing be offered to all patients, ages 13 to 64 years, receiving health care services. Implementation of this legislation is complex, especially in the emergency department (ED). This study explores ED providers' perceptions of the factors affecting the implementation of the law. METHODS: The authors conducted six focus group sessions and three in-depth interviews with ED health care providers from two New York City teaching hospitals. Sessions were audiotaped and transcribed. Data were coded and summarized thematically through an iterative process after each session. RESULTS: A total of 49 providers participated and data saturation was achieved. Six factors were identified that predispose a provider to offer an HIV test: 1) self-efficacy, 2) behavioral intention, 3) the testing process, 4) provider knowledge of the legislation, 5) type of HIV test, and 6) follow-up procedures. Five factors were identified that enable providers to offer an HIV test: 1) resources related to time, 2) space, 3) staff, 4) type of test, and 5) timing of the offer. Improving access to HIV testing, linkage to care, and public health were all key factors in reinforcing providers' desire to offer HIV tests. Concerns regarding overall cost saving and coverage for the test were indicated as barriers that needed to be resolved to reinforce the providers to offer an HIV test. CONCLUSIONS: Understanding the factors influencing the practice of ED providers charged with carrying out this mandate is critical. Despite earlier research that indicated that offering HIV testing to ED patients is largely influenced by cost, this study found additional factors that are important to consider to effectively implementing HIV testing in the ED.

[Neoliberalism in health: the torture of the health care workers of the Bogota's Instituto Materno Infantil (child and maternity hospital)]. / Neoliberalismo en salud: la tortura de trabajadoras y trabajadores del Instituto Materno Infantil de Bogotá.

OBJECTIVES: To link, from a historical point of view, the most significant transformations of the Instituto Materno Infantil (IMI) [the oldest child and maternity hospital of the country] during its process of crisis, closure and liquidation with the experiences of the hospital workers. To find experience-based and theoretical elements that can interconnect the process of health care privatization of the country with the workers' experiences of resistance and pain/suffering. METHODS: Critically-oriented ethnography based on continuous collective field work, historical research (primary and secondary sources) and semi-structured interviews with 5 women who worked at the IMI for more than 15 years. RESULTS: A time line of 4 main periods: Los años de gloria [The golden years] (up to 1990); Llega el neoliberalismo [Neoliberalism arrives] (1990-2000); La crisis y las resistencias [Crisis and resistances] (2001-2005); and Liquidación [Liquidation (2006-20??)]. The narratives of the interviewed women unveil multiple aggressions that have intensified since 2006, have caused pain and suffering and are examples of violations of human and labour rights. DISCUSSION: We suggest to analyze the links between the different kinds of violence and pain and suffering as torture. This category is defined as the set of violent actions that cause physical and emotional pain, which are performed by actors in positions of power over other people who challenge that power and are part of modern States' ideological principles around a defined moral social order. For the IMI workers' case, the ideological principle that is being challenged is health care neoliberalism. From the analyses of bureaucracy, confinement, torturing agents, and the breaking-off of the body-mind unit we conclude that this relationship between neoliberalism and torture aims to eliminate the last health care workers of the country who had job stability and full-benefits through public labour contracts. Their elimination furthers the accumulation of capital generated by increasing over-exploitation of labour and commodification of health care.

Case studies at Denver Health: 'patient dumping' in the emergency department despite EMTALA, the law that banned it.

The Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act was enacted in 1986 to prevent hospitals from turning away patients with emergency medical conditions, often because they were uninsured--a practice commonly known as "patient dumping." Twenty-five years later, Denver Health--a large, urban, safety-net hospital--continues to experience instances in which people with emergency conditions, many of whom are uninsured, end up in the safety-net setting after having been denied care or receiving incomplete care elsewhere. We present five case studies and discuss potential limitations in the oversight and enforcement of the 1986 law. We advocate for a more effective system for reporting and acting on potential violations, as well as clearer standards governing compliance with the law.

Neoliberalismo en salud: La tortura de trabajadoras y trabajadores del Instituto Materno Infantil de Bogotá / Neoliberalism in health: the torture of the health care workers of the Bogota s Instituto Materno Infantil (child and maternity hospital)

Objetivos Relacionar históricamente las transformaciones más significativas del Instituto Materno Infantil (IMI) en su proceso de crisis, cierre y liquidación con las experiencias de sus trabajadores/as. Encontrar elementos vivenciales y teóricos que interconecten el proceso de privatización de la salud con las experiencias de resistencia y dolor/sufrimiento de trabajadores/as. Métodos Etnografía inscrita en corrientes críticas y apoyada en trabajo de campo constante y colectivo, investigación histórica (fuentes primarias y secundarias) y entrevistas semiestructuradas con cinco mujeres que trabajaron por más de quince años en el IMI. Resultados Una línea del tiempo con cuatro periodos principales: Los años de gloria (hasta 1990), Llega el neoliberalismo (1990-2000), La crisis y las resistencias (2001-2005) y Liquidación (2006-). La narrativa de las mujeres entrevistadas devela múltiples agresiones que se intensificaron desde el 2006 generando dolor/ sufrimiento, relatos que ilustran violaciones a sus derechos humanos y laborales. Discusión Proponemos analizar las conexiones entre los diferentes tipos de violencia y el dolor/sufrimiento bajo la categoría tortura, entendida como acciones violentas que causan dolor físico-emocional, las cuales son ejecutadas por actores de poder sobre otros que desafían alterarlo. Enfatizamos en las burocracias, el confinamiento, los agentes torturadores y los resquebrajamientos a la unidad mente/cuerpo para argumentar que esta relación neoliberalismo y tortura pretende eliminar los últimos trabajadores/as de la salud del país con garantías laborales para avanzar en la acumulación de capital que genera la creciente sobreexplotación del trabajo y la mercantilización de la salud.

Objectives To link, from a historical point of view, the most significant transformations of the Instituto Materno Infantil (IMI) [the oldest child and maternity hospital of the country] during its process of crisis, closure and liquidation with the experiences of the hospital workers. To find experience-based and theoretical elements that can interconnect the process of health care privatization of the country with the workers' experiences of resistance and pain/suffering. Methods Critically-oriented ethnography based on continuous collective field work, historical research (primary and secondary sources) and semi-structured interviews with 5 women who worked at the IMI for more than 15 years.Results: A time line of 4 main periods: Los años de gloria [The golden years] (up to 1990); Llega el neoliberalismo [Neoliberalism arrives] (1990-2000); La crisis y las resistencias [Crisis and resistances] (2001-2005); and Liquidación [Liquidation (2006-20??)]. The narratives of the interviewed women unveil multiple aggressions that have intensified since 2006, have caused pain and suffering and are examples of violations of human and labour rights. Discussion We suggest to analyze the links between the different kinds of violence and pain and suffering as torture. This category is defined as the set of violent actions that cause physical and emotional pain, which are performed by actors in positions of power over other people who challenge that power and are part of modern States' ideological principles around a defined moral social order. For the IMI workers' case, the ideological principle that is being challenged is health care neoliberalism. From the analyses of bureaucracy, confinement, torturing agents, and the breaking-off of the body-mind unit we conclude that this relationship between neoliberalism and torture aims to eliminate the last health care workers of the country who had job stability and full-benefits through public labour contracts. Their elimination furthers the accumulation of capital generated by increasing over-exploitation of labour and commodification of health care.

Early and late preterm delivery rates - a comparison of differing tocolytic policies in a single urban population.

OBJECTIVE: Preterm delivery results in neonatal morbidity and mortality. We set out to estimate the difference in rates of preterm delivery in two institutions, serving a single population, with differing policies regarding use of tocolytic drugs for the prevention of preterm delivery. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective study comparing preterm delivery rates between 2002 and 2007 in two large tertiary hospitals serving a single urban population with similar risk factor profile located less than 2 miles from each other. During the study period Hospital A routinely used tocolytic therapy, Hospital B operates a policy of never using any tocolytic drugs. Rates of delivery prior to 26, 30, 34 and 37 weeks were compared for each hospital. RESULTS: During the study period there were 90,843 deliveries between the two hospitals. The overall rates of preterm delivery at less than 37 weeks gestation were comparable with 6.62% (2794/42,232) in Hospital A and 6.15% (2989/48,611) in Hospital B (p = 0.99). There was no significant difference in the numbers delivering at less than 34 weeks, 995/42,232 (2.36%) versus 1134/48,611 (2.33%), p = 0.59, less than 30 weeks, 403/42,232 (0.95%) versus 429/48,611 (0.88%), p = 0.87 or prior to 26 weeks, 126/42,232 (0.29%) versus 121/48,611 (0.25%), p= 0.08. CONCLUSION: In this large population routine use of tocolytic drugs in the treatment of threatened preterm labor does not alter rates of early or late preterm delivery. While this study is limited by its retrospective nature, it calls into question the practice of tocolysis.

Impact of nurse staffing mandates on safety-net hospitals: lessons from California.

CONTEXT: California is the first and only state to implement a patient-to-nurse ratio mandate for hospitals. Increasing nurse staffing is an important organizational intervention for improving patient outcomes. Evidence suggests that staffing improved in California hospitals after the mandate was enacted, but the outcome for hospitals bearing a disproportionate share of uncompensated care-safety-net hospitals-remains unclear. One concern was that California's mandate would burden safety-net hospitals without improving staffing or that hospitals would reduce their skill mix, that is, the proportion of registered nurses of all nursing staff. We examined the differential effect of California's staffing mandate on safety-net and non-safety-net hospitals. METHODS: We used a time-series design with Annual Hospital Disclosure data files from the California Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development (OSHPD) for the years 1998 to 2007 to assess differences in the effect of California's mandate on staffing outcomes in safety-net and non-safety-net hospitals. FINDINGS: The mandate resulted in significant staffing improvements, on average nearly a full patient per nurse fewer (-0.98) for all California hospitals. The greatest effect was in those hospitals with the lowest staffing levels at the outset, both safety-net and non-safety-net hospitals, as the legislation intended. The mandate led to significantly improved staffing levels for safety-net hospitals, although there was a small but significant difference in the effect on staffing levels of safety-net and non-safety-net hospitals. Regarding skill mix, a marginally higher proportion of registered nurses was seen in non-safety-net hospitals following the mandate, while the skill mix remained essentially unchanged for safety-net hospitals. The difference between the two groups of hospitals was not significant. CONCLUSIONS: California's mandate improved staffing for all hospitals, including safety-net hospitals. Furthermore, improvement did not come at the cost of a reduced skill mix, as was feared. Alternative and more targeted designs, however, might yield further improvement for safety-net hospitals and reduce potential disparities in the staffing and skill mix of safety-net and non-safety-net hospitals.

Delegation within municipal health care.

AIM: To describe how registered nurses (RNs) perceive delegation to unlicensed personnel (UP) in a municipal healthcare context in Sweden. BACKGROUND: Within municipal health care RNs often delegate tasks to UP. The latter have practical training, but lack formal competence. METHOD: Twelve RNs were interviewed and the material was analysed using a phenomenographic approach. RESULTS: Owing to a shortage of RNs, delegation is seen as a prerequisite for a functioning organization. This necessity also involves a number of perceived contradictions in three areas: (1) the work situation of RNs - facilitation and relief vs. lack of control, powerlessness, vagueness regarding responsibility, and resignation; (2) the relationship with unlicensed personnel - stimulation, possibility for mentoring, use of UP competence and the creation of fairness vs. questioning UP competence; and (3) The patients - increase in continuity, quicker treatment, and increased security vs. insecurity (with respect to, for example, the handling of medicine). CONCLUSION: Registered nurses perceptions of delegation within municipal healthcare involve their own work situation, the UP and the patients. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING MANAGEMENT: Registered nurses who delegate to UP must be given time for mentoring such that the nursing care is safe care of high quality.

[Community outbreak of pneumonia due to Legionella pneumophila: importance of monitoring hospital cooling towers]. / Brote comunitario de neumonía por Legionella pneumophila: importancia del control de las torres de refrigeración en los centros sanitarios.

OBJECTIVE: Description of an outbreak of legionnaires' disease originating in one of the cooling towers of a hospital. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This study included patients with confirmed pneumonia caused by Legionella pneumophila serogroup 1 and related to the Vallcarca neighborhood of Barcelona (Spain) in August 2004. Exposure was determined by a standardized questionnaire. An environmental investigation was carried out to identify the source of the outbreak. A descriptive analysis including incidence rates estimation was performed, as well as molecular study to document the genetic identity among human and environmental strains. RESULTS: Thirty-three cases of L. pneumophila pneumonia were detected. Median age was 68 years and 70% of the affected patients were men. Incidence rate among residents in less than 200 meters of the source and older than 65 was 888.9 cases/100,000 inhabitants. Lethality rate was 6%. Four seasonal cooling towers that were not registered with the authorities were identified in a health care center. L. pneumophila was isolated from all four and at least one colony in each tower had the same genetic profile as the strains isolated from patients. CONCLUSIONS: An association was demonstrated between a community outbreak of legionellosis and unregistered seasonal cooling towers located in a hospital. All risk facilities should be registered and inspected to ensure that they fulfill current legislation requirements.